What’s wrong with this sentence?
“I walked down the street, bustling and filled with activity, early one morning in Mexico City.”
It seems like a perfectly correct sentence, right? The commas are in the right place, it uses activity, it identifies a setting. So why isn’t it a good sentence? The answer is that it really doesn’t evoke much of a picture–it doesn’t put the reader in the scene. Now consider a short passage from Sandra Cisneros’s Carmelo:
The racket of the street bustle–street cleaners, merchants with all of their merchandise on their back, chairs, baskets, brooms, the fruit vendor, the sherbet vendor, the charcoal vendor, the butter vendor, whistles and shouts, rattle of wheels, clip-clop of horses, hum of electric trains, hoarse, sad cries of the mules hauling streetcars, slap of guaraches, click-click-click of hard boots, the unmistakable Mexico City morning smelll of hot aotmeal, orange peel, fresh-baked bollilo bread, and the ripe tang of sewer foulness.
See the difference? Description is made by using details–details that essentially “paint” the scene in the reader’s mind. So now it’s your turn. Take this sentence, and turn it into a rich, sensual experience. Then send me what you’ve come up with!
I was two blocks away from my childhood elementary school, and it had been 20 years since I walked down this small-town street.
Go for it!
TEN THINGS EDITORS WON’T TELL YOU
You’ve bought all the reference books. You’re subscribing to at least one writers’ magazine. Each month you’ve read it from cover to cover—looking for special tips and “insider” information. You’ve studied advice about query letters, read all the updates about new magazines and what they pay, and attended a writers’ conference or two. You’ve listened to countless hours of advice about how to get an Read the rest of this entry »